Watching: Re: a question for believers in objectivism

Video scenes shots:    Watch the video: Other videos by this author: Re: A Question for Believers in Objectivism Posted by: loneRambler Video duration: 569 seconds A hopefully sufficient answer to the questions posed by "ScientificDiscussio n" -- regarding the triad of Rationalism, Empiricism, and Objectivism. Related: ayn, berkeley, burke, debate, discussing, discussion, hume, locke, objectivism, rand, rationalism, rationalist, science, scientific Book Review 'On Aristotle' - Ch 1 Posted by: loneRambler Video duration: 596 seconds The 1st of a 10-video book review (1 video per chapter). It's more like a chapter-by-chapter "walk-through" with emphasis on my own marginalia. Related: aristotle, book, review Closer to Fine Posted by: loneRambler Video duration: 205 seconds Showing some talent now ... Related: closer, fine, girls, indigo Re: Ayn Rand: An Insignificant Philosopher Posted by: loneRambler Video duration: 469 seconds (1) Refutation of the notion that Rand isn't popular, or "immortalized" in the minds of others (2) Refutation of the notion that popularity entails significance (3) Refutation of the notion that membership in a group or a professional "society" entails significance Related: ayn, debate, discussion, douglas, insignificant, lincoln, philosopher, rand, science, scientific A Little Ditty Jingle from a Rand fan Posted by: loneRambler Video duration: 84 seconds My first music video attempt. Related: attempt, ditty, fan, first, jingle, little, rand, reason, rebirth Re: I´ll show you mine if you show me yours Posted by: loneRambler Video duration: 237 seconds David didn't beat Goliath because he had more size, he beat Goliath because he was more selective in the kind of weapon he chose. ;-) Related: books, discussion, science, scientific, topics Re: Objectivism is for cranks. Posted by: loneRambler Video duration: 560 seconds I erred in not mentioning Rand's reductio ad absurdum argument against a "sense-invalidity" one: 1) Using my senses, things can appear different than they are. 2) Senses that don't pick-up things just as they are, aren't to ever be trusted. ================= Therefore (using a method that can't be trusted), it follows that senses err. Related: crackpots, cult, morons, newbs, objectivism, rand   Search for a video theme of your choice. You like it? Share it! Search for a video theme of your choice. You like it? Share it!

Chocolate Bar videos :: Social Bookmarking :: Videos are copyright their respective owners.